‘Equity’ is the new buzz-word in the development debate ― as if we all agree, as if it is not a controversial issue. ‘Equity’ does not only mean better access to services, or better distribution. It means RE-distribution.

It means that in order for others to get more, someone has to get less. We do ourselves a huge disservice by pretending that this is not highly political and controversial.

The aid system is about transferring money from rich to poor countries. This is still needed, but in addition, more emphasis must be put on transferring money from rich to poor people within countries.

Reduced differences within a country is important from a human rights perspective. But it is also important for security and economic reasons. Large inequalities lead to instability, risk of civil disorder and higher crime rates. It is a threat to continued economic growth.

Read more…

For a long time, the world saw in Africa mainly hopeless poverty and destitution. Now, observers are seeing a continent with economic growth, peace and several examples of democratic progress.

Originally, foreign aid was about transferring resources from rich to poor countries. Nearly all of the world’s poorest people used to live in the poorest countries. Today, only 30 per cent of the poorest people live in very poor countries. The other 70 per cent live in middle-income countries. These developments are reasons for reconsidering our aid policies.

It is important not only to consider inequalities between countries, but also within countries. Equitable distribution is an important value in itself, but it is also positive for economic growth. Large inequalities mean higher risks of conflict and social unrest, which are also obstacles to growth.

Norway is already contributing to an equitable distribution. But I want us to do more in this regard. This calls for support from all good forces; analytic journalists such as Gravdal, research communities, Norad and non-government organisations.

Read more…